mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christophe.varoqui@free.fr
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC]partitions through device-mapper
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:39:35 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1035898775.3dbe8f97d1a3f@imp.free.fr> (raw)

Hello, 
 
now that the device mapper is merged into mainline, I would like to open a 
discussion on the possible in-kernel partition handling clean-up. 
 
In-kernel partition handling covers : 
o parsing of the on-disk partition tables 
o partition block devices creation / structs 
 
Along with initramfs will come the possibility to rip off the partition tables 
parsing from the kernel : a userspace parser like partx (part of util-linux 
toolset) can teach the kernel the partition layout. 
 
As driverfs provides elegantly block device add/remove events to hotplug, calls 
to partx can be wrapped into the block.agent 
 
The device-mapper merging could enable the ripping of all kernel partition 
understanding by creating linear device-maps over partitions. 
 
As a proof of concept, I've mutated partx to create those mappings. This tool 
is available for testing and commenting at : 
http://dsit.free.fr/dmpartx.tar.bz2 
 
This tool cannot damage your data : BLKPG_DEL_PARTITION and  
BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION ioctls are removed from the source. 
 
I would like to receive feedback over the following points : 
 
* Is this proposal completely out of the point ? Have I overlooked some 
important implementation details ? 
 
* driverfs send block device-removal-event at the end of the job, but device 
removal cannot happen as there are device-mappings over it. This ordering 
forbids hotplug to trigger the partition-mappings flush before block-device 
removal. Can this ordering be changed, or is there another solution ? 
 
* 2.5.44-ac4 did not notify block-device-add upon scsi disk insertion with 
scsi-add-single-device, which I think is known by scsi subsystem maintainers. 
-> The block.agent provided with dmpartx is not tested. 
 
* Should dmpartx create the 0-lengh partitions ? It does not at the moment. 
Extended partitions are handled the same way as partx : resize to 63 blocks 
 
 
regards, 
cvaroqui 

             reply	other threads:[~2002-10-29 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-29 13:39 christophe.varoqui [this message]
2002-10-29 14:22 ` Alexander Viro
2002-10-29 18:41   ` christophe varoqui
2002-10-29 23:14     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1035898775.3dbe8f97d1a3f@imp.free.fr \
    --to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome