From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753467Ab3A2QAR (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:00:17 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:40374 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894Ab3A2QAM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:00:12 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.4-dev To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Shaohua Li , Sasha Levin , Andrew Morton , Shaohua Li , Rik van Riel , Minchan Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: boot warnings due to swap: make each swap partition have one address_space In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:40:40 -0800." From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <5101FFF5.6030503@oracle.com> <20130125042512.GA32017@kernel.org> <20130127141253.GA27019@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1359474972_2191P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:56:12 -0500 Message-ID: <10359.1359474972@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=dagger.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020206.5107F11D.01CC,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1359474972_2191P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:40:40 -0800, Hugh Dickins said: > My reservations so far would be: how many installations actually have > more than one swap area, so is it a good tradeoff to add more overhead > to help those at the (slight) expense of everyone else? The increasingly > ugly page_mapping() worries me, and the static array of swapper_spaces > annoys me a little. Right now, probably few. But the number may go up a lot if the whole 'zram-for-swapspace' thing catches on and/or ships in a distro... --==_Exmh_1359474972_2191P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBUQfxHAdmEQWDXROgAQIxbw/+N1MQpUPq+NXQQZTBK1tTvYXz4zDp5GCe yZ6kUMCOI/z/gAJhU9F8cyUQytu2LOk6cCbMOvceIulVBMVUdvVzWxz9UmIS/fXC 85qbulgXIGiCh5hOemqq5LhRzlOws9uX/0HOIUZVQOKBGa8gWSs+qHXwwwtpcDm0 VGLjqmY3dSGp0KWt46FPCm0ddg60uIQfEANFr/fyZTuxE2HoZHs5oADLI0c9nx9Q pEcEBypJPSoqXrPToQhO+y23+y4Dwo75z4iw91d9FyUt6+SQ2Ki4c6UU+z9mvUEB QHvlRXnq9jQvFOfy02ivYJW5EiUxH7L0D36LMDCQ4lCMyCfBTdOF2Sfr+pyV0hop Z/cVe0IgXph1K1QsKA6X74NUWbrg77EvN9QAdxjHCOKXTymqhpJR+p3pMl/3D1fa toi7sBYqXsVt+8ydpt0LsszIJTZvOLaTFf5FwkN76+U4DWbeJUIV9yaTwsiGdO1d /ZgEn1U3GExA/UjDiNGmgUEOI65Bgx1nm2qgf7TVFL77BJQyN/2M3MJzcE2tAwbW zija8wt7/81mUAxxTNSN6WsjFnEQ0FvUJ6+Gn3i6ThuDEJyGebxucxql/Vp6DvCH RXdDSoUypaUGCy0Km+VtF5t2317Bofi99+Kq8RKLcCHse9z1pjHzrKjAlDkW3ExH FPc5J5cI9OI= =Ll4n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1359474972_2191P--