From: Andy Pfiffer <andyp@osdl.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@in.ibm.com>,
Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
fastboot@osdl.org, Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Ph. Marek" <marek@bmlv.gv.at>,
Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>,
Torrey Hoffman <thoffman@arnor.net>,
Rob Landley <landley@trommello.org>,
Kasper Dupont <kasperd@daimi.au.dk>
Subject: Re: [CFT] [PATCH] kexec 2.5.44 (minimal)
Date: 30 Oct 2002 14:41:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1036017717.1726.7.camel@andyp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1lm4jj7v5.fsf_-_@frodo.biederman.org>
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 00:16, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> And is currently kept in two pieces.
> The pure system call.
> http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/linux-2.5.44.x86kexec-2.diff
>
> And the set of hardware fixes known to help kexec.
> http://www.xmission.com/~ebiederm/files/kexec/linux-2.5.44.x86kexec-hwfixes.diff
Eric,
Hmmm... I'm having a lot more problems on my troublesome machine with
this patchset than I did with the previous iteration. I've
triple-checked the application of the patches, but I can't even get
kexec_test to start, much less run to completion.
The new behavior is that the system appears to hang immediately after
invoking "kexec kexec_test".
What could I have done wrong?
Thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-30 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-19 10:10 kexec for 2.5.44 (Who do I send this to?) Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-19 19:23 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 21:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20 23:02 ` Rob Landley
2002-10-21 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-21 14:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 20:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-20 19:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-26 13:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-27 17:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-27 22:51 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-30 14:02 ` Pavel Machek
2002-10-30 15:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-28 8:16 ` [CFT] [PATCH] kexec 2.5.44 (minimal) Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-30 22:41 ` Andy Pfiffer [this message]
2002-10-31 3:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1036017717.1726.7.camel@andyp \
--to=andyp@osdl.org \
--cc=VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@osdl.org \
--cc=kasperd@daimi.au.dk \
--cc=landley@trommello.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek@bmlv.gv.at \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=thoffman@arnor.net \
--cc=wa@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome