[Please CC me replies as I'm not on the list] Le mar 26/11/2002 à 14:41, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > In fact I've been cleaning up a bit the 2.4 version before > submitting it -- the entries for other VIA chips are a bit > more convoluted and I suspect the first patch is not as > complete as it should be. In fact I think I'll post a 2.5 > followup soon. > > Please do not apply the first patch and use this one instead. Which was webmail-borked. Sorry, should not have let the other submission rush me. Anyway here is a cleaned-up tested version for 2.4.20-rc4. It's basically a straight port of the 2.5 patch, plus the dri bits I missed in 2.5 (purely cosmetic, but hey not having his dmesg full of unknown chips is always nice), plus some kt400-related pci ids for the database. The effect is the same as the patch that went in 2.5, with a few nicer printks. Please apply -- Nicolas Mailhot