From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 04:29:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 04:29:31 -0500 Received: from tmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.20]:42260 "EHLO tmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 1 Dec 2002 04:29:30 -0500 Subject: 2.4.20 DRM/DRI issue with Radeon From: Andy Jefferson To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2-5mdk Date: 01 Dec 2002 09:36:13 +0000 Message-Id: <1038735373.2617.12.camel@monster.ajsoft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In the 2.4.20 kernel changelog I see comments about having consistent DRM modules with XFree4.2.0. I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a Dell laptop and would like to get DRI working. Whenever I use any 2.4.* (including 2.4.20) kernel I get the following messages in /var/log/XFree86.0.log, and DRM is not enabled. Is this supposed to be working in 2.4.20 ? I am using a Mandrake 8.2 system (except for the kernel). (II) RADEON(0): [drm] loaded kernel module for "radeon" driver (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "PCI:1:0:0" (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xd1bb1000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xd1bb1000 to 0x40026000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xe0000000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIScreenInit failed because of a version mismatch. [dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but version 1.2.x is needed. [dri] see http://gatos.sf.net/ for an updated module [dri] Disabling DRI. (EE) RADEON(0): [drm] failed to remove DRM signal handler (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel Thx -- Andy