Re: radeonfb almost there.. but not quite! :)

["Paulo Andre'" <fscked@netvisao.pt>]

On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 16:01, James Simmons wrote:
> > This is on an IBM Thinkpad A30p with 1600x1200 local display.
> > > radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN
> > > radeonfb: ref_clk=2700, ref_div=60, xclk=16600 from BIOS
> > > radeonfb: probed DDR SGRAM 32768k videoram
> > > radeon_get_moninfo: bios 4 scratch = 1000004
> > > radeonfb: panel ID string: 1600x1200
> > > radeonfb: detected DFP panel size from BIOS: 1600x1200
> > > radeonfb: ATI Radeon M6 LY DDR SGRAM 32 MB
> > > radeonfb: DVI port LCD monitor connected
> > > radeonfb: CRT port no monitor connected
> > > radeonfb_pci_register END
> > 
> > Do you have CONFIG_DRM=y ?
> > 
> > I'd _really_ like to have some feedback from James Simmons on this.
> 
> I'm here. I see the radeon fbdev driver is detected and it works :-) The 
> issue is a X conflict. Does disabling CONFIG_DRM work? 
> 
Doesn't solve my problem. To tell you the truth I already use CONFIG_DRM=n
for a while now considering it keeps me from switching from console to X
(either in 2.4 or 2.5). It just locks hard if I do so.

Anyway, it can't be an X conflict, as far as I'm concerned because the
problems happen on the framebuffer console, not X related. Please refer
to my first email, which I sent to you directly and to this list, for
details.

And thanks for your reply.

	../Paulo