From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Olaf Titz <olaf@bigred.inka.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ANN: LKMB (Linux Kernel Module Builder) version 0.1.16
Date: 19 Jan 2003 14:06:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1042981591.1479.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E18aEyl-0006O0-00@bigred.inka.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1267 bytes --]
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 13:55, Olaf Titz wrote:
> It is also a bug that parts of the development infrastructure are
> installed in /lib/modules/<version> and it's somewhat documented that
> compiling modules needs this /lib/modules/<version> stuff. That may be
> true for the ideal, simplified Red Hat world but in reality the
> machine and running OS version of the development machine is likely
> different from the box it will run on. Mixing development environment
> and install target only causes confusion.
you make a series of good points before this. However
/lib/modules/<version>/build is nothing Red Hat specific. It's something
that is the result of a similar discussion long ago where Linus finally
decreed this location for finding the full source of modules.
Combine that with the makefile dwmw2 showed and you can compile external
modules EVERYWHERE on ANY distribution (assuming said distribution
doesn't go out of the way to break the decree). Afaik RHL, SuSE,
Mandrake, Debian and Slackware at least have this correct.
Yes it breaks if you move around your source after doing make
modules_install. Yes it breaks if you don't have the tree at all. But
both situations are "invalid" wrt the decree, and need a fixed symlink.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-19 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-17 12:31 Shlomi Fish
2003-01-17 12:37 ` Shlomi Fish
2003-01-17 13:12 ` David Woodhouse
2003-01-17 17:00 ` Shlomi Fish
2003-01-17 18:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-17 18:28 ` Shlomi Fish
2003-01-18 22:37 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-18 22:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-01-20 20:03 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-20 21:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-01-21 21:16 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-21 21:30 ` David Lang
2003-01-21 21:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-22 11:21 ` David Woodhouse
2003-01-22 11:18 ` David Woodhouse
2003-01-22 19:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-22 22:17 ` David Woodhouse
2003-01-19 0:12 ` John Levon
2003-01-19 12:55 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-19 13:06 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2003-01-20 20:16 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-19 18:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-20 20:14 ` Olaf Titz
2003-01-20 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-19 21:17 Paul Zimmerman
2003-01-19 21:24 Paul Zimmerman
2003-01-23 0:20 Hal Duston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1042981591.1479.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@bigred.inka.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®