From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:45:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:45:31 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:63442 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:45:30 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.5.59-mjb3 (scalability / NUMA patchset) From: Mark Haverkamp To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <315150000.1044297722@flay> References: <19270000.1038270642@flay><134580000.1039414279@titus> <32230000.1039502522@titus><568990000.1040112629@titus> <21380000.1040717475@titus> <821470000.1041579423@titus> <214500000.1041821919@titus> <676880000.1042101078@titus> <922170000.1042183282@titus> <437220000.1042531505@titus> <190030000.1042787514@titus> <19610000.1043137151@titus> <20200000.1043806571@flay> <125620000.1044238081@[10.10.2.4]> <1044297228.29537.5.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> <315150000.1044297722@flay> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1044298502.29532.8.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 03 Feb 2003 10:55:02 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 10:42, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> The patchset contains mainly scalability and NUMA stuff, and anything > >> else that stops things from irritating me. It's meant to be pretty stable, > >> not so much a testing ground for new stuff. > >> > >> I'd be very interested in feedback from anyone willing to test on any > >> platform, however large or small. > >> > >> http://www.aracnet.com/~fletch/linux/2.5.59/patch-2.5.59-mjb3.bz2 > >> > > > > I tried 2.5.59-mjb3 today on our 16 processor numaq and got a boot > > hang. I had been running 2.5.59-mjb2 previously. I have included the > > console output and my config file. > > What gcc are you using? I'm betting 3.2 ... 2.95 seems to work fine. You are right, I am using: gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7) > (still might be an issue with the patch, just trying to track it down) > > M. -- Mark Haverkamp