mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Ion Badulescu <ionut@badula.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define
Date: 19 Feb 2003 14:07:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045692476.14306.14.camel@rth.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302191316230.29393-100000@guppy.limebrokerage.com>

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 10:20, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> Well, yes and no. Indeed those checks are optimized away, but as a result 
> of using them most data-access macros must be converted to inline 
> functions. And, last I heard at least, gcc was optimizing inline functions 
> much worse than preprocessor macros.

Not true, you can still use macros and GCC is saner with inlines
these days.

Your arguments are nice to encourage your patch to be accepted,
they are however not correct.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-19 18:11 James Bottomley
2003-02-19 18:20 ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 22:07   ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-02-19 22:41     ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 22:29       ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 22:53         ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 22:38           ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-23  7:02 Albert Cahalan
2003-02-23  7:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-23  7:20   ` Albert Cahalan
2003-02-19 16:26 Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 17:20 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-02-19 17:28   ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 22:06     ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 22:04       ` Ion Badulescu
2003-02-19 22:06   ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 21:48     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-22 10:06       ` Ingo Oeser
2003-02-19 22:01 ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1045692476.14306.14.camel@rth.ninka.net \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=ionut@badula.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®