From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 04:46:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 04:46:02 -0500 Received: from Mix-Lyon-107-1-150.abo.wanadoo.fr ([193.249.22.150]:7303 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 04:45:23 -0500 Subject: Re: ethernet-ATM-Router freezing From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Marc Haber Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030222130704.GB25040@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> References: <20030222084958.GC23827@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> <1045914526.12534.153.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> <20030222130704.GB25040@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1045994345.12533.168.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 23 Feb 2003 10:59:05 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 14:07, Marc Haber wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 12:48:46PM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Your reasoning is wrong. It can well be a HW failure, those can be > > load related in various way (memory failure happening when memory > > is actually used, thermal failure happening on CPU load, etc...) > > > > If the exact same setup worked for a while with same/similar loads > > and suddenly started to fail, there are great chances it's actually > > HW failure (possibly RAM). > > So you think that we have had two machines going bad on us with the > same kind of failure within just a few days? Sorry, my fault, I mis-read your post and though only one of the boxes was freezing. Ben.