From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S269199AbTCBBCD>; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 20:02:03 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S269200AbTCBBCD>; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 20:02:03 -0500
Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:10392
	"EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S269199AbTCBBCC>; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 20:02:02 -0500
Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed KitBeeper clone
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Arador <diegocg@teleline.es>
Cc: "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com>, andrea@suse.de,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       pavel@janik.cz, pavel@ucw.cz, hch@infradead.org
In-Reply-To: <20030302014915.34a6de37.diegocg@teleline.es>
References: <200303020011.QAA13450@adam.yggdrasil.com>
	 <20030302014915.34a6de37.diegocg@teleline.es>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1046571336.24903.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) 
Date: 02 Mar 2003 02:15:36 +0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 00:49, Arador wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 16:11:55 -0800
> "Adam J. Richter" <adam@yggdrasil.com> wrote:
> 
> (Just a very personal suggestion)
> Why to waste time trying to clone a 
> tool such as bitkeeper? Why not to support things like subversion?

Because the repositories people need to read are in BK format, for better
or worse. It doesn't ultimately matter if you use it as an input filter
for CVS, subversion or no VCS at all.