From: Laurent Bonnaud <bonnaud@altern.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Judy library faster than
Date: 10 Mar 2003 18:23:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047317035.7788.107.camel@irancy.lis.inpg.fr> (raw)
Hi,
I recently came across this library:
http://judy.sourceforge.net/
that claims to be several times faster than standard map and hash
implementations thanks to more efficient processor cache use.
Would someone care to compare it to hash map implementations found in
the Linux kernel ?
reply other threads:[~2003-03-10 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1047317035.7788.107.camel@irancy.lis.inpg.fr \
--to=bonnaud@altern.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®