mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, David Miller <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] (5/8) Eliminate brlock from netfilter
Date: 11 Mar 2003 16:14:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1047428094.15872.105.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303091831560.2129-100000@home.transmeta.com>

Replace brlock in netfilter code with RCU.

diff -urN -X dontdiff linux-2.5.64/net/core/netfilter.c linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/core/netfilter.c
--- linux-2.5.64/net/core/netfilter.c	2003-03-11 09:08:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.5-nobrlock/net/core/netfilter.c	2003-03-11 14:39:38.000000000 -0800
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/if.h>
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
-#include <linux/brlock.h>
 #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/route.h>
@@ -46,6 +45,7 @@
 
 struct list_head nf_hooks[NPROTO][NF_MAX_HOOKS];
 static LIST_HEAD(nf_sockopts);
+static spinlock_t nf_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
 
 /* 
  * A queue handler may be registered for each protocol.  Each is protected by
@@ -56,28 +56,31 @@
 	nf_queue_outfn_t outfn;
 	void *data;
 } queue_handler[NPROTO];
+static spinlock_t queue_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
 
 int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 {
 	struct list_head *i;
 
-	br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_lock_bh(&nf_lock);
 	for (i = nf_hooks[reg->pf][reg->hooknum].next; 
 	     i != &nf_hooks[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]; 
 	     i = i->next) {
 		if (reg->priority < ((struct nf_hook_ops *)i)->priority)
 			break;
 	}
-	list_add(&reg->list, i->prev);
-	br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	list_add_rcu(&reg->list, i->prev);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void nf_unregister_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
 {
-	br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_lock_bh(&nf_lock);
 	list_del(&reg->list);
-	br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&nf_lock);
+
+	synchronize_kernel();
 }
 
 /* Do exclusive ranges overlap? */
@@ -344,7 +347,9 @@
 			       int (*okfn)(struct sk_buff *),
 			       int hook_thresh)
 {
-	for (*i = (*i)->next; *i != head; *i = (*i)->next) {
+
+	for (*i = (*i)->next; *i != head; *i = (*i)->next,
+		     ({ read_barrier_depends(); 0;})) {
 		struct nf_hook_ops *elem = (struct nf_hook_ops *)*i;
 
 		if (hook_thresh > elem->priority)
@@ -381,15 +386,16 @@
 {      
 	int ret;
 
-	br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_lock_bh(&queue_lock);
 	if (queue_handler[pf].outfn)
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 	else {
-		queue_handler[pf].outfn = outfn;
 		queue_handler[pf].data = data;
+		wmb();
+		queue_handler[pf].outfn = outfn;
 		ret = 0;
 	}
-	br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&queue_lock);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -397,10 +403,14 @@
 /* The caller must flush their queue before this */
 int nf_unregister_queue_handler(int pf)
 {
-	br_write_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_lock_bh(&queue_lock);
 	queue_handler[pf].outfn = NULL;
+	wmb();
 	queue_handler[pf].data = NULL;
-	br_write_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&queue_lock);
+
+	synchronize_kernel();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -422,9 +432,10 @@
 	struct net_device *physoutdev = NULL;
 #endif
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (!queue_handler[pf].outfn) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	info = kmalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_ATOMIC);
@@ -433,7 +444,7 @@
 			printk(KERN_ERR "OOM queueing packet %p\n",
 			       skb);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	*info = (struct nf_info) { 
@@ -463,8 +474,9 @@
 #endif
 		kfree(info);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
-		return;
 	}
+ out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 int nf_hook_slow(int pf, unsigned int hook, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -491,7 +503,7 @@
 	}
 
 	/* We may already have this, but read-locks nest anyway */
-	br_read_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
 	if (skb->nf_debug & (1 << hook)) {
@@ -520,7 +532,7 @@
 		break;
 	}
 
-	br_read_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -530,8 +542,7 @@
 	struct list_head *elem = &info->elem->list;
 	struct list_head *i;
 
-	/* We don't have BR_NETPROTO_LOCK here */
-	br_read_lock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	for (i = nf_hooks[info->pf][info->hook].next; i != elem; i = i->next) {
 		if (i == &nf_hooks[info->pf][info->hook]) {
 			/* The module which sent it to userspace is gone. */
@@ -569,7 +580,7 @@
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		break;
 	}
-	br_read_unlock_bh(BR_NETPROTO_LOCK);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* Release those devices we held, or Alexey will kill me. */
 	if (info->indev) dev_put(info->indev);




  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-12  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-09 23:44 [PATCH] small fixes in brlock.h Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-10  0:00 ` Robert Love
2003-03-10  0:03   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-10  0:10     ` Robert Love
2003-03-10  1:11       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-10  0:15 ` Robert Love
2003-03-10  2:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-10 21:54     ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-12  0:13     ` [PATCH] (0/8) replace brlock with RCU Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:23       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12  0:28         ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12  1:36           ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-12  0:14     ` [PATCH] (1/8) Eliminate brlock in psnap Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  1:03       ` Roman Zippel
2003-03-12  1:13       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-12  0:14     ` [PATCH] (2/8) Eliminate brlock for packet_type Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:20       ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12  0:25         ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:14     ` [PATCH] (3/8) Eliminate brlock from vlan Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:14     ` [PATCH] (4/8) Eliminate brlock in net/bridge Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:14     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2003-03-12  1:25       ` [PATCH] (5/8) Eliminate brlock from netfilter Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-03-12  0:15     ` [PATCH] (6/8) Eliminate brlock from ipv4 Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:15     ` [PATCH] (7/8) Eliminate brlock from IPV6 Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:15     ` [PATCH] (8/8) Kill brlock Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:23       ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12  0:31         ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  0:34           ` David S. Miller
2003-03-12  0:44             ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-12  0:48               ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-03-12  2:31               ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1047428094.15872.105.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®