From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix powerbook media bay
Date: 24 Mar 2003 02:49:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1048470547.582.23.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1048460903.10712.89.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 00:08, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 21:34, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > Is the IDE stuff still in the middle of open-heart surgery? I'm happy
> > to hack on it and send you patches if it isn't all going to change
> > dramatically in the next week anyway.
>
> Its on the crash trolley right now, but we think we may be able to save
> the patient. The registration is saner now for PCI but not for the non
> PCI cases. In addition the resource allocation is ass backwards and that
> I will change at some point so the caller does the resource work.
> PC9800 requires this really, PCMCIA badly needs it, and it lets me
> remove a ton of hacks from the mmio aware drivers.
Yes, please, do that :)
I did the hwif->mmio == 2 case especially for that purpose, that is
let the hwif driver deal with resource management since I need it
for ide-pmac.
(today, hwif->mmio == 0 means PIO, == 1 means MMIO with request_xxx
done by the generic code & other assumptions, and == 2 means the
generic code does nothing)
Paul: regarding media-bay, don't waste too much time on this for 2.5,
the whole probing stuff is going to change once I get the macio-asic
bus getting in and all those drivers moved to the new model.
The kernel still badly lacks some good way to deal with driver
dependencies (similar what I did with OCP stuff where a driver
can return -EAGAIN on probe when it relies on some other
not-yet-probed driver, but that's really a hack).
What I will do is that:
- PCI layer will probe the macio-asic (based on matching the
OF node with whatever pmac_feature will have detected. I did consider
moving all of pmac_feature to macio-asic, but we still need too many
stuff beeing initialized early, so at least for 2.5, it will stay split)
- macio-asic declares a bus type, and will probe devices based
on the OF tree. At this point, it will probe media-bays first
- then it probes IDE drivers. Thus, the registration mecanism of
ide-pmac will be a carbon-copy of the one for IDE PCI devices.
In order to deal with ordering properly, media-bay will not call
ide_register_hw directly. Instead, it will call a pmac-ide specific
routine (either via macio-asic, that is it will force macio-asic
to add a new device to it's tree as by default, it will only be
one level deep, or I will go directly to ide-pmac, I haven't
decided yet).
At that point, ide-pmac can decide what to do, that is just reserve
the hwif slot for later probe, or really call ide_register_hw.
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-24 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-23 5:19 Paul Mackerras
2003-03-23 15:38 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-23 21:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-03-23 23:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-24 1:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1048470547.582.23.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®