From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 06:38:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 06:38:12 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.254] ([81.2.110.254]:12273 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 06:38:12 -0500 Subject: Re: Query about SIS963 Bridges From: Alan Cox To: John Wendel Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030401191836.40ff4b5f.jwendel10@attbi.com> References: <1049208265.19703.14.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030401191836.40ff4b5f.jwendel10@attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049280661.16275.0.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 02 Apr 2003 11:51:02 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 04:18, John Wendel wrote: > It seems to me that if SIS has provided the chipset docs to Microsoft, > then a polite note from Redhat legal that mentions "RESTRAINT OF TRADE" > might work wonders. Perhaps Alan could get the RH lawyers involved. And what good would that do ? At the moment I'm trying to get them to talk sanely about workable NDA's with vendors. Alan