From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:02:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:02:02 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:8895 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:01:54 -0500 Subject: Re: cpufreq isn't supported on 440BX From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <20030402145216.GC10453@poup.poupinou.org> References: <1049232042.637.12.camel@teapot> <20030402145216.GC10453@poup.poupinou.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049317982.698.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 02 Apr 2003 23:13:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 16:52, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > I think that cpufreq isn't supported for Intel Pentium III Mobile > > (Coppermine) processors on Intel 440BX motherboards. Is this true? > > yes. > > > If so, are there any plans on getting this support in a foreseable future? > > I am trying to get it. But I got only semi-success on it, and therefore > I have not cleaned up things in order to even considering to send a patch > to the cpufreq maintainer. At least someone is trying to get it working! Glad to know this :-) ________________________________________________________________________ Linux Registered User #287198