From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263301AbTDINCe (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:02:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263303AbTDINCe (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:02:34 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:38043 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263301AbTDINCd (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:02:33 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting From: Alan Cox To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: Andre Hedrick , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200304090816_MC3-1-33A4-BDC1@compuserve.com> References: <200304090816_MC3-1-33A4-BDC1@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049890509.9897.29.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 09 Apr 2003 13:15:10 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2003-04-09 at 13:13, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > ANdre Hedrick wrote: > > >Does the broadcom driver have a test for who owns the intq? > >If it is eating the hpt370's interrupt, well you already see the picture. > > > Using edge-triggered interrupts with sharing is a bad idea, no? PCI IRQ lines are level triggered