From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263518AbTDIPAX (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:00:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263519AbTDIPAX (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:00:23 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:10908 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263518AbTDIPAW (for ); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:00:22 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.21pre6 (__ide_dma_test_irq) called while not waiting From: Alan Cox To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200304091038_MC3-1-33B3-570A@compuserve.com> References: <200304091038_MC3-1-33B3-570A@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1049897143.10380.22.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 09 Apr 2003 15:05:44 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2003-04-09 at 15:35, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Even when /proc/interrupts says XT-PIC? I have uniprocessor > MPS 1.4 machines and build IO-APIC kernels for them because > I thought it was safer to share interrupts that way. The > four extra IRQ lines help, too. :) IDE is a bit more complex than basic stuff but PCI lines to the PIC are level triggered Legacy IRQ for host IDE controllers may be edge triggered but if so won't be shared