From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261349AbTDKRKt (for <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:10:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261360AbTDKRKt (for <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:10:49 -0400
Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:8617
	"EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261349AbTDKRKp (for <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:10:45 -0400
Subject: Re: Question regarding Intel i845 chipset.
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: war@lucidpixels.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030411160420.21571.qmail@lucidpixels.com>
References: <20030411160420.21571.qmail@lucidpixels.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1050078248.14780.2.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 11 Apr 2003 17:24:09 +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Gwe, 2003-04-11 at 17:04, war@lucidpixels.com wrote:
> Is IO-APIC broken on the Intel 845 chipset?

No.

Not all BIOS vendors get the tables right however.