mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shaheed R. Haque" <srhaque@iee.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:56:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1050177383.3e986f67b7f68@netmail.pipex.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050146434.3e97f68300fff@netmail.pipex.net>



Hmmm, AFAICS, sched_getaffinity() and sched_setaffinity() 
allow the calling process to be bound to the nominated CPU(s), but that is not 
the same as giving them exclusive access, is it? In other words, other 
processes which have no particualr affinity needs can presumably still be 
scheduled to run on the same processor. 

I am looking for something more akin to the patch I referred to...or did I miss 
something in the effect of set_cpus_allowed()?

Thanks for the replies, Shaheed



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-12 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-12 11:20 Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 12:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-12 12:24 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-12 14:54   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-12 18:23   ` Robert Love
2003-04-12 19:56 ` Shaheed R. Haque [this message]
2003-04-12 20:02   ` Robert Love
2003-04-13  8:30     ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-13 14:28       ` Robert Love
2003-05-13 11:49         ` 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-13 20:02           ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 22:46             ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14  2:42               ` Steven Cole
2003-05-14 11:49                 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 13:08                   ` Steven Cole
2003-05-13 22:49             ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 11:02               ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-05-14 15:59                 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 16:04                   ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 21:01                   ` shaheed
2003-05-14 21:15                     ` Robert Love
2003-05-15  9:19                       ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-15 15:32                         ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:07                           ` shaheed
2003-05-15 20:20                             ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:24                             ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 21:30                               ` shaheed
2003-04-13  3:52   ` Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-15 11:39   ` [HOWTO] Emulate processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6 \"shaheed r. haque\"
2003-04-14 22:40 ` [RFC] patch to allow CPUs to be reserved to callers of sys_setaffinity [was Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?] shaheed
2003-05-01 20:19 ` Working .config for a Dell 2650 for 2.5.6x? (was Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?) shaheed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1050177383.3e986f67b7f68@netmail.pipex.net \
    --to=srhaque@iee.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome