From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262941AbTDNJ5m (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 05:57:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262942AbTDNJ5m (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 05:57:42 -0400 Received: from griffon.mipsys.com ([217.167.51.129]:52693 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262941AbTDNJ5l (for ); Mon, 14 Apr 2003 05:57:41 -0400 Subject: Re: Subtle semantic issue with sleep callbacks in drivers From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Patrick Mochel Cc: linux-kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <1050314423.5574.65.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> References: <1050314423.5574.65.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1050315066.5574.71.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 14 Apr 2003 12:11:06 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I also noticed the IDE PM code is hopeless, I'll try to hack something > that works at least as good than what I had in the pmac 2.4 code, and > the fbdev PM code is almost unexisting (I need at least a way for the > driver to tell the PM layer not to mess with the framebuffer once the ^^ > driver is asleep). I'll hack something as well. ... to tell the fbdev layer ... you will have corrected yourself ;) Ben.