From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263893AbTDVW7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:59:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263896AbTDVW7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:59:51 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-136.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.136]:47241 "HELO fs5-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263893AbTDVW7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:59:51 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.5 kernel hangs system From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: root@chaos.analogic.com Cc: Dave Mehler , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <000501c3090c$71683c60$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1051053106.710.4.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 (1.2.3-1) Date: 23 Apr 2003 01:11:46 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 23:00, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > First, I don't understand how as you say, "suggestions are > desperately needed" on a developmental kernel. These things are > not known to work on all configurations and some information like > "It gives me hex codes..." is worthless. Please write down > these "hex-codes" and, after booting a version the works, run them > through ksymoops. If you don't know what that is: ksymoops? I thought 2.5 kernels didn't need ksymoops anymore and that function names were automatically "guessed" in call stack traces. -- Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Linux Registered User #287198