From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262269AbTD3PQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262272AbTD3PQf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:16:35 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:9878 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262269AbTD3PP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:15:58 -0400 Subject: Re: IBM x440 problems on 2.4.20 to 2.4.20-rc1-ac3 From: Alan Cox To: Wojciech Sobczak Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <01d601c30f17$f3ffadf0$b312840a@nbsobczak> References: <01d601c30f17$f3ffadf0$b312840a@nbsobczak> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1051712978.19573.32.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 30 Apr 2003 15:29:39 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mer, 2003-04-30 at 13:56, Wojciech Sobczak wrote: > with NUMA support and summit/exa support and clustered apic support kernel > boots, found scsi devices but hangs on it with lost interruption, also with > ide devices and so on That sounds like a bug. Make sure you ACPI off for x440 if you are testing and see if that helps For vendor kernels you need Red Hat AS 2.1 or UnitedLinux 1.0. At least I don't believe other vendors rolled kernels for x440 but I may be wrong about that - certainly I can believe Debian or Gentoo might have. x440 is sufficiently weird it needs its own extras and that makes it hard to support for vendors. Alan