From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261165AbTEDQyg (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2003 12:54:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261171AbTEDQyg (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2003 12:54:36 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:7841 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261165AbTEDQye (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 May 2003 12:54:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Workaround bogus CF cards From: Alan Cox To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1052043277.4107.76.camel@gaston> References: <1052043277.4107.76.camel@gaston> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1052064504.1240.12.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 04 May 2003 17:08:25 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sul, 2003-05-04 at 11:14, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Hi ! > > I had a problem with an "APACER" Compact Flash card. It seems that > beast is allergic to WIN_READ_NATIVE_MAX. Thats probably a drive->flash check you need looking at the docs I have I don't see where any CF supports READ_NATIVE_MAX (of course it shouldnt die either)