From: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>,
akpm@digeo.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: OSDL DBT-2 AS vs. Deadline 2.5.68-mm2
Date: 07 May 2003 10:39:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052329151.25135.14.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030507173637.GQ823@suse.de>
On Wed, 2003-05-07 at 10:36, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, May 07 2003, markw@osdl.org wrote:
> > On 7 May, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 07 2003, markw@osdl.org wrote:
> > >> I've collected some data from STP to see if it's useful or if there's
> > >> anything else that would be useful to collect. I've got some tests
> > >> queued up for the newer patches, but I wanted to put out what I had so
> > >> far.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> METRICS OVER LAST 20 MINUTES:
> > >> --------------- -------- ----- ---- -------- -----------------------------------
> > >> Kernel Elevator NOTPM CPU% Blocks/s URL
> > >> --------------- -------- ----- ---- -------- -----------------------------------
> > >> 2.5.68-mm2 as 1155 94.3 8940.2 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/271356/
> > >> 2.5.68-mm2 deadline 1255 94.9 9598.7 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/271359/
> > >>
> > >> FUNCTIONS SORTED BY TICKS:
> > >> -- ------------------------- ------- ------------------------- -------
> > >> # as 2.5.68-mm2 ticks deadline 2.5.68-mm2 ticks
> > >> -- ------------------------- ------- ------------------------- -------
> > >> 1 default_idle 6103428 default_idle 5359025
> > >> 2 bounce_copy_vec 86272 bounce_copy_vec 97696
> > >> 3 schedule 63819 schedule 70114
> > >> 4 __make_request 30397 __blk_queue_bounce 31167
> > >> 5 __blk_queue_bounce 26962 scsi_request_fn 26623
> > >> 6 scsi_request_fn 24845 __make_request 25012
> > >
> > > uhh nasty, you are spending a lot of time bouncing. How much RAM is in
> > > the machine, and what is the scsi hba?
> >
> > The system has 4GB of memory and has a DECchip 21554 (aacraid) that the
> > external drives are connected to. Mark Haverkamp is currently trying to
> > address those bounce buffers.
>
> aacraid actually looks sane enough. so you should just be able to set
> host->highmem_io and it should work.
That is what I thought, but I wanted to get a machine with lots of
memory to try it out on.
Mark.
--
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-07 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-07 16:33 markw
2003-05-07 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-07 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2003-05-07 16:59 ` markw
2003-05-07 17:36 ` Jens Axboe
2003-05-07 17:39 ` Mark Haverkamp [this message]
2003-05-07 22:41 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-07 16:59 ` Martin Josefsson
2003-05-07 17:32 ` markw
2003-05-08 1:41 ` Nick Piggin
2003-05-08 16:12 ` markw
2003-05-08 16:17 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1052329151.25135.14.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markw@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®