From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261373AbTEMP4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 11:56:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261786AbTEMPzi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 11:55:38 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:31387 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261369AbTEMPyS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2003 11:54:18 -0400 Subject: Re: ARM26 [NEW ARCHITECTURE] From: Alan Cox To: Ian Molton Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20030513163001.3a80f822.spyro@f2s.com> References: <20030513153315.73679a38.spyro@f2s.com> <1052835818.431.37.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030513163001.3a80f822.spyro@f2s.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1052838520.463.43.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 13 May 2003 16:08:41 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2003-05-13 at 16:30, Ian Molton wrote: > it is 2.5 targetted currently 2.5.30, but the arch/ and asm/ stuff is > independant as far as the rest of the tree is concerned, so it may as > well go in as 'current' and then I can submit smaller patches to 'catch > up' with the rest. > > it actually compiles on 2.5.30 (at least, some of it does ;-) and runs, > excpet so far, mm stuff fails and user-land falls over HARD ver early. > > where do I send my patches? ;-) I'll roll the include/asm and arch/arm26 bits into -ac happily, if only so they are seen for criticism. (Read hch filling your mailbox 8))