From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262235AbTENN1p (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:27:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262246AbTENN1p (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:27:45 -0400 Received: from prv-tm12.provo.novell.com ([192.108.102.142]:2695 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262235AbTENN1o convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2003 09:27:44 -0400 Subject: Re: supermount From: "ismail donmez" To: gutko@poczta.onet.pl CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 07:40:31 -0600 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1052919631.273b9220kde@smtp-send.myrealbox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yeah I wonder the same for some time . Is there a good reason not to include supermount in kernel? -----Original Message----- From: Maciej Górnicki To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:30:02 +0200 Subject: supermount Hello, Why supermount code is not included in kernel? It's maintained by Juan Jose Quintela from Mandrake...