From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: time interpolation hooks
Date: 16 May 2003 19:38:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1053139080.7308.6.camel@rth.ninka.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16069.24454.349874.198470@napali.hpl.hp.com>
On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 15:00, David Mosberger wrote:
> Andrew> (Those function pointers should go away in favour of
> Andrew> optionally-stubbed-out static calls. Minor point).
>
> Really? On ia64, we want to use cycle-based interpolation by default,
> but if firmware indicates that the cycle-counters may drift, we want
> to switch to one of several possible external counters (which counter
> gets used depends on hardware/drivers are is present).
I think Andrew is really suggesting to declare these two things
in an arch header, so if one needs it to be a function pointer one
can make it so.
--
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-17 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-16 21:23 Andrew Morton
2003-05-16 22:00 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-17 2:38 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-05-19 17:34 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-19 17:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-19 18:35 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-19 18:57 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-20 7:26 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-19 22:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-19 23:03 ` David Mosberger
2003-05-19 23:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-17 9:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-17 16:31 ` john stultz
2003-05-17 16:37 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1053139080.7308.6.camel@rth.ninka.net \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®