mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Yohan Joung <jyh429@gmail.com>,
	jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] f2fs: fix to ensure queued discard commands are properly issued
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:11:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <105491ee-17a1-4f6d-aa0c-5cb5864d185c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_x2v9fhorDWx9+f4VufddSPA5S6PF22AM_56smjjD5Faw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/21/25 23:56, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 4:38 AM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/4/25 22:53, Yohan Joung wrote:
>>> F2FS zone storage requires discard and reset zone for each conventional,
>>> zoned device.
>>> In the current configuration, Discard granularity is set to the zone
>>> size but queuing is inserted into the pend list with a maximum size of the
>>> segment size As a result queued commands cannot be issued.
>>> so we are restorting discard granularity to its original state
>>
>> It seems commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option")
>> introduced a bug: when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
>> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
>> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
>> cause bug. blkzoned feature became the victim since it use
>> discard_unit=section option by default.
>>
>> What:           /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/discard_granularity
>> Date:           July 2017
>> Contact:        "Chao Yu" <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> Description:    Controls discard granularity of inner discard thread. Inner thread
>>                 will not issue discards with size that is smaller than granularity.
>>                 The unit size is one block(4KB), now only support configuring
>>                 in range of [1, 512]. Default value is 16.
>>                 For small devices, default value is 1.
>>
>> What about this?
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
>>
>> commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option") introduced
>> a bug, when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
>> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
>> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
>> cause issue_discard_thread() in DPOLICY_BG mode will not select discard entry
>> w/ any granularity to issue.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option")
>> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 6ebe25eafafa..2b415926641f 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -2320,10 +2320,9 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>         dcc->discard_granularity = DEFAULT_DISCARD_GRANULARITY;
>>         dcc->max_ordered_discard = DEFAULT_MAX_ORDERED_DISCARD_GRANULARITY;
>>         dcc->discard_io_aware = DPOLICY_IO_AWARE_ENABLE;
>> -       if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SEGMENT)
>> +       if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SEGMENT ||
>> +               F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SECTION)
>>                 dcc->discard_granularity = BLKS_PER_SEG(sbi);
>> -       else if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SECTION)
>> -               dcc->discard_granularity = BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>>
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->entry_list);
>>         for (i = 0; i < MAX_PLIST_NUM; i++)
>> --
>> 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>

Thanks for the review, let me send a formal patch.

Thanks,

> 
>>


      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-04 14:53 Yohan Joung
2025-02-17 12:38 ` Chao Yu
2025-02-21 15:56   ` Daeho Jeong
2025-02-24  6:11     ` Chao Yu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=105491ee-17a1-4f6d-aa0c-5cb5864d185c@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jyh429@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yohan.joung@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®