From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@gmail.com>
Cc: Yohan Joung <jyh429@gmail.com>,
jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] f2fs: fix to ensure queued discard commands are properly issued
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:11:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <105491ee-17a1-4f6d-aa0c-5cb5864d185c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACOAw_x2v9fhorDWx9+f4VufddSPA5S6PF22AM_56smjjD5Faw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/21/25 23:56, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 4:38 AM Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/4/25 22:53, Yohan Joung wrote:
>>> F2FS zone storage requires discard and reset zone for each conventional,
>>> zoned device.
>>> In the current configuration, Discard granularity is set to the zone
>>> size but queuing is inserted into the pend list with a maximum size of the
>>> segment size As a result queued commands cannot be issued.
>>> so we are restorting discard granularity to its original state
>>
>> It seems commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option")
>> introduced a bug: when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
>> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
>> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
>> cause bug. blkzoned feature became the victim since it use
>> discard_unit=section option by default.
>>
>> What: /sys/fs/f2fs/<disk>/discard_granularity
>> Date: July 2017
>> Contact: "Chao Yu" <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> Description: Controls discard granularity of inner discard thread. Inner thread
>> will not issue discards with size that is smaller than granularity.
>> The unit size is one block(4KB), now only support configuring
>> in range of [1, 512]. Default value is 16.
>> For small devices, default value is 1.
>>
>> What about this?
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to set .discard_granularity correctly
>>
>> commit 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option") introduced
>> a bug, when we enable discard_unit=section option, it will set
>> .discard_granularity to BLKS_PER_SEC(), however discard granularity only
>> supports [1, 512], once section size is not equal to segment size, it will
>> cause issue_discard_thread() in DPOLICY_BG mode will not select discard entry
>> w/ any granularity to issue.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f993264fe29 ("f2fs: introduce discard_unit mount option")
>> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 6ebe25eafafa..2b415926641f 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -2320,10 +2320,9 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> dcc->discard_granularity = DEFAULT_DISCARD_GRANULARITY;
>> dcc->max_ordered_discard = DEFAULT_MAX_ORDERED_DISCARD_GRANULARITY;
>> dcc->discard_io_aware = DPOLICY_IO_AWARE_ENABLE;
>> - if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SEGMENT)
>> + if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SEGMENT ||
>> + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SECTION)
>> dcc->discard_granularity = BLKS_PER_SEG(sbi);
>> - else if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).discard_unit == DISCARD_UNIT_SECTION)
>> - dcc->discard_granularity = BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
>>
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->entry_list);
>> for (i = 0; i < MAX_PLIST_NUM; i++)
>> --
>> 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
Thanks for the review, let me send a formal patch.
Thanks,
>
>>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-24 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 14:53 Yohan Joung
2025-02-17 12:38 ` Chao Yu
2025-02-21 15:56 ` Daeho Jeong
2025-02-24 6:11 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=105491ee-17a1-4f6d-aa0c-5cb5864d185c@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jyh429@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yohan.joung@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®