From: Dana Lacoste <dana.lacoste@peregrine.com>
To: Martin List-Petersen <martin@list-petersen.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux and IBM : "unauthorized" mini-PCI : TCPA updates
Date: 09 Jun 2003 08:57:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055163473.25882.13.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1054940371.3044.40.camel@loke>
On Fri, 2003-06-06 at 18:59, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> Eerh, dumb question here: Is this MiniPCI Wlan cards in general or how ?
> I ask, because i've seen MiniPCI Wlan cards and i've seen cards that in
> fact are PC-Card Wlan cards and a PC-Card-to-PCI bridge put together on
> a MiniPCI card, just adding another PC-Card slot to your notebook and
> inserting a Wlan card there (Dell TrueMobile 1150).
IIRC, it's the antenna PLUS the WLan card that gets FCC licensed,
so you violate FCC rules by allowing a card without an antenna,
and this is why even 'regular' pcmcia cards all have their own
'unique' antenna jacks, so you can't plug in an off the shelf antenna
and boost your signal.
So the theory that the IBM laptops with built in antennas can't
use just any mini-PCI card makes sense, even if it is stupid.
They would have been licensed for specific cards only, and would
be violating the FCC license to use other cards.
I hope that's all it is. If they had some other reason I'd be very
pissed off if I bought a stinkpad. (Wait a minute, I did buy a
stinkpad :)
Dana Lacoste
Ottawa, Canada
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-03 16:49 Lincoln Durey
2003-06-03 16:34 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-03 18:29 ` Josh Litherland
2003-06-03 17:04 ` Michael Frank
2003-06-03 17:42 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-04 12:39 ` Derek Fawcus
2003-06-06 22:59 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-09 12:57 ` Dana Lacoste [this message]
2003-06-09 16:56 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-10 23:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-07-07 18:12 ` Linux and IBM : "unauthorized" mini-PCI : Cisco mpi350 _way_ sub-optimal Lincoln D. Durey
2003-07-08 14:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-08 15:20 ` Gerald Britton
2003-07-08 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-08 17:24 ` Gerald Britton
2003-07-08 17:44 ` Russell King
2003-07-08 20:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-09 22:35 ` Gerald Britton
2003-06-03 19:35 Linux and IBM : "unauthorized" mini-PCI : TCPA updates Mark Grosberg
2003-06-03 19:40 ` Mike Dresser
2003-06-03 20:02 ` Josh Litherland
2003-06-03 20:40 ` Mike Dresser
2003-06-03 21:09 ` Josh Litherland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055163473.25882.13.camel@dlacoste.ottawa.loran.com \
--to=dana.lacoste@peregrine.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin@list-petersen.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®