mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
To: Jay Denebeim <denebeim@deepthot.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build problems with Linux 2.5
Date: 11 Jun 2003 13:39:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055363996.32400.0.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101427260.13724-100000@dent.deepthot.org>

On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:26, Jay Denebeim wrote:
> (.70, but I doubt that makes a difference)
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
>   I've been way out of kernel compiling for a long time, however I just
> took a job writing device drivers on Linux so I guess I'll be doing quite
> a bit of it again.  I've not built a kernel other than an occasional 'make
> rpm' on redhat since the 2.0 days, so be gentle with me.
> 
>   The problem I'm having is with the kernel.  My environment is a standard 
> Redhat 9 installation:
> 
> gcc-3.2.2-5
> binutils-2.13.90.0.18-9
> modutils-2.4.22-8
> kernel-smp-2.4.20-9
> 
>   The problem I'm having seems to be related to modutils.  When I make 
> very many modules I can't install the system because depmod can't find 
> symbols undery 2.4.  However using nm I can see that those symbols are 
> indeed defined.  If I make a bare bones system and only have the two or 
> three modules I need (I'm working with SCSI device drivers and need to 
> unload/reload the modules) the depmod passes, but the modprobe fails with 
> QM_MODULES: function unimplemented.
> 
>   So, I went grepping through the source code and QM_MODULES exists in 
> linux/module.h in 2.4, but not in 2.5.  Since modutils depends on that 
> functionality heavily modutils must have been re-written.  However the 
> latest version I can find on kernel.org is 2.4.25 and it still uses 
> QM_MODULES.  So, where is it?


http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/


> 
>   Are there other things I'm going to need for 2.5?  I've already figured 
> out LVM is totally different, and that breaks mkinitrd if I've got root on 
> a logical volume.  Anything else?
> 
>   Thanks in advance for your time.
> 
>   Jay
-- 
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-11 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-11 20:26 Jay Denebeim
2003-06-11 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-11 20:39 ` Mark Haverkamp [this message]
2003-06-11 20:40 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2003-06-11 20:40 ` Vincent Hanquez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1055363996.32400.0.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=markh@osdl.org \
    --cc=denebeim@deepthot.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®