From: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
To: Jay Denebeim <denebeim@deepthot.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Build problems with Linux 2.5
Date: 11 Jun 2003 13:39:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055363996.32400.0.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101427260.13724-100000@dent.deepthot.org>
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 13:26, Jay Denebeim wrote:
> (.70, but I doubt that makes a difference)
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been way out of kernel compiling for a long time, however I just
> took a job writing device drivers on Linux so I guess I'll be doing quite
> a bit of it again. I've not built a kernel other than an occasional 'make
> rpm' on redhat since the 2.0 days, so be gentle with me.
>
> The problem I'm having is with the kernel. My environment is a standard
> Redhat 9 installation:
>
> gcc-3.2.2-5
> binutils-2.13.90.0.18-9
> modutils-2.4.22-8
> kernel-smp-2.4.20-9
>
> The problem I'm having seems to be related to modutils. When I make
> very many modules I can't install the system because depmod can't find
> symbols undery 2.4. However using nm I can see that those symbols are
> indeed defined. If I make a bare bones system and only have the two or
> three modules I need (I'm working with SCSI device drivers and need to
> unload/reload the modules) the depmod passes, but the modprobe fails with
> QM_MODULES: function unimplemented.
>
> So, I went grepping through the source code and QM_MODULES exists in
> linux/module.h in 2.4, but not in 2.5. Since modutils depends on that
> functionality heavily modutils must have been re-written. However the
> latest version I can find on kernel.org is 2.4.25 and it still uses
> QM_MODULES. So, where is it?
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/
>
> Are there other things I'm going to need for 2.5? I've already figured
> out LVM is totally different, and that breaks mkinitrd if I've got root on
> a logical volume. Anything else?
>
> Thanks in advance for your time.
>
> Jay
--
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 20:26 Jay Denebeim
2003-06-11 20:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-11 20:39 ` Mark Haverkamp [this message]
2003-06-11 20:40 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2003-06-11 20:40 ` Vincent Hanquez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055363996.32400.0.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=denebeim@deepthot.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®