From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261265AbTFQGpf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:45:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263270AbTFQGpf (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:45:35 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:19979 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261265AbTFQGpe (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:45:34 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.4.21: NFS copy produces I/O errors From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Ole Marggraf Cc: Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: References: <1055800323.586.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1055833159.587.2.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 17 Jun 2003 08:59:19 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 00:04, Ole Marggraf wrote: > > > By the way, are you using the "soft" option to mount the NFS volumes > > > > Yes, forgot to mention... But its quite clear from the error message. > > > > Mount options are rw,soft,bw,rsize=8192,wsize=8192. > > Ok, correction. (I should go home and get some sleep...) > rsize=8192,wsize=8192 were not set in the original testing setup, I had > the defaults there (1024 both). The amount of bytes written till the I/O > error gets up does scale with that option. Please, don't use the "soft" option. Instead, use "hard" as there are problems with the former. I had the same problems with I/O errors. Trond told me to stick with "hard" at the moment.