From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264399AbTGAFdj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:33:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265976AbTGAFdj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:33:39 -0400 Received: from mail.cpt.sahara.co.za ([196.41.29.142]:4598 "EHLO workshop.saharact.lan") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264399AbTGAFco (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:32:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove IO APIC newline From: Martin Schlemmer To: Diego Calleja =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Garc=EDa?= Cc: Jeff Garzik , KML In-Reply-To: <20030627205742.48f107c2.diegocg@teleline.es> References: <200306271836.h5RIakGD026159@hera.kernel.org> <20030627184111.GB4333@gtf.org> <20030627205742.48f107c2.diegocg@teleline.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1057039383.5499.46.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3- Date: 01 Jul 2003 08:03:04 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 20:57, Diego Calleja García wrote: > I did a patch wich makes dmesg output of SMP machines better. Well, it doesn't > adds or removes any line; but it says "CPUX:". The patch ugly, basically > it adds smp_processor_id() output in every printk i found. I did it because > IMHO messages like "Intel machine check architecture supported" in a SMP machine > are ugly. I'd found it specially nice for big SMP boxes because this does dmesg > easily grep'able. > > > -Initializing CPU#0 > +CPU0: Initializing > [...] > -Calibrating delay loop... 1602.35 BogoMIPS > +CPU0: Calibrating delay loop... 1602.35 BogoMIPS > [...] Wont it be more consistant to rather use CPU#0, CPU#1, etc ? Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer