From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] patch-O1int-0306302317 for 2.5.73 interactivity
Date: 01 Jul 2003 14:00:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1057060831.603.6.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307011931.24586.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 11:31, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:59, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > I'm using 1000HZ. With respect to X, I haven't noticed any major
> > difference. Should I? I haven't tested it under very heavy loads, but
> > under normal workloads, it behaves a little better than its predecesors.
>
> I'd say it would depend on the graphic card. On a sis630 even with a p3 1133
> it is embarassingly jerky under even the slightest of loads without my patch.
> However, it is as good now without the granularity patch as earlier with the
> granularity.
When I say "X feels jerky", I mean that I can notice the scheduler is
not giving the X server enough CPU cycles (I mean, a continuous,
smaller, but more frequent CPU timeslice) to perform window movement and
redrawing fast enough to get ~25fps. Also, I don't think it's related to
the video card. The combo patch I did with Mike's + Ingo's enhacements
works beautifully for me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-01 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-30 14:29 Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 18:27 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-06-30 22:50 ` Con Kolivas
2003-06-30 21:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-06-30 21:54 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 8:59 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-01 9:31 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 12:00 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2003-07-01 12:04 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 13:17 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-01 13:29 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-01 16:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-06-30 22:03 ` Wiktor Wodecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1057060831.603.6.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®