From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Linux v2.6.0-test1
Date: 14 Jul 2003 12:33:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058182417.561.47.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307141139.h6EBd09g000700@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
On Llu, 2003-07-14 at 12:39, John Bradford wrote:
> > > > The point of the test versions is to make more people realize that they
> > > > need testing
> > >
> > > Are all the known security issues in 2.4 now fixed in 2.6.0-test1?
> >
> > No, and several more have been added in 2.6-test only.
>
> As far as I know, they are only information disclosure ones, not
> directly exploitable vulnerabilities, or am I wrong?
Last time I checked there were remote DoS attacks and local root attacks
present in 2.5.7x
> > > This has been the only major reason for keeping of most of my
> > > production machines running 2.4 for quite a while. If not, can we get
> > > the fixes in at the earliest opportunity?
> >
> > Sure.. send the fixes to Linus
>
> Is anybody even keeping track of this, though? Picking thorough LKML
> to see what did and didn't go in doesn't seem particularly exciting to
> me.
Then you'll just have to wait a few months
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-14 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-14 11:39 John Bradford
2003-07-14 11:33 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2003-07-14 13:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-14 15:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 16:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-15 7:52 Dirk Meul
2003-07-16 6:32 ` Martin Schlemmer
2003-07-14 11:50 John Bradford
2003-07-14 11:53 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-14 12:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-14 12:39 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 12:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-14 12:47 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 12:40 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 16:55 ` Kurt Wall
2003-07-14 11:01 John Bradford
2003-07-14 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-14 3:59 Linus Torvalds
2003-07-15 4:11 ` Matt Reppert
2003-07-15 10:56 ` Dave Jones
2003-07-15 17:38 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-07-15 18:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-05-22 20:12 DMA gone on ALI 1533 Peter
2003-07-14 7:26 ` Linux v2.6.0-test1 Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058182417.561.47.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®