From: "Michael Troß" <mtross@compu-shack.com>
To: "Udo A. Steinberg" <us15@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CPU Lockup with 2.4.21 and 2.4.22-pre
Date: 22 Jul 2003 14:55:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1058878505.2232.122.camel@mtross2.csintern.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0001F474@gwia.compu-shack.com>
Am Die, 2003-07-22 um 13.51 schrieb Udo A. Steinberg:
> Note that the fddi patch includes a patch you've previously sent me, which
> isn't present in the driver on your website.
As you might know, the Compu-Shack fddi products reached end-of-life
last year.
> If you need more information, let me know. Also if you have any tips or
> patches that would help in debugging the issue, I'm happy to try them.
As I can't locate the code sequence in my driver module, please check it
with your compiled kernel:
objdump -d vmlinux | grep -A 20 "7e f5" | grep csfddi
or module:
hexdump -e '32/1 "%02x " "\n"' csf.o | grep "7e f5 e9 e8"
Do you get a result like the code line from your oops, which eip is
referring to?
> MT> What makes you believe this? There is no matching code sequence like the
> MT> one from your dump in the driver, to be exact: in a driver compiled with
> MT> gcc 3.3 and kernel 2.4.21.
>
> The fact that the backtrace in the decoded oops looks like the lockup
> happened in the fddi driver led me to the conclusion that this may be
> the culprit.
But you got two different decoding results, didn't you ?!
> Regards,
> -Udo.
Regards,
Michael
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-22 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <0001F474@gwia.compu-shack.com>
2003-07-22 12:55 ` Michael Troß [this message]
2003-07-22 14:24 ` Udo A. Steinberg
[not found] <0001F49C@gwia.compu-shack.com>
2003-07-22 15:26 ` Michael Troß
2003-07-22 15:30 ` Udo A. Steinberg
[not found] <0001F3D0@gwia.compu-shack.com>
2003-07-22 10:24 ` Michael Troß
2003-07-22 11:51 ` Udo A. Steinberg
2003-07-21 14:12 Udo A. Steinberg
2003-07-21 14:17 ` Udo A. Steinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1058878505.2232.122.camel@mtross2.csintern.de \
--to=mtross@compu-shack.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=us15@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®