From: Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Mathias Fröhlich" <Mathias.Froehlich@web.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.0-test2_mtrr-race-fix_A0
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 11:05:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060193108.12048.4.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1060190104.10732.52.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 10:15, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 01:52, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > You should not remove the barrier past mtrr change. If you do that, it is
> > possible that cpu's run with inconsistent mtrrs. This can have bad
> > sideeffects since at least the cache snooping protocol used by intel uses
> > assumptions about the cachability of memory regions. Those information about
> > the cachability is also taken from the mtrrs as far as I remember.
> > This intel cpu developer manual, which documented the early PII and PPro
> > chips, recommended this algorithm. Since actual intel cpus use the same old
> > cpu to chipset bus protocol, this old documentation most propably still
> > applies.
>
> Hmm. I should dig up that doc. Its a little hazy in my mind, but I think
> I understand your description. I'm glad you caught this, as I can't
> imagine the subtle bugs that might have popped up.
>
> Well, let me look at it again and see if I can come up with a proper
> fix.
>
> Thanks for the knowledgeable feedback and sanity checking!
> -john
I added an extra sync up from the caller after the last gate change so
it is the last one to touch the automatic data.
Mark.
===== arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c 1.29 vs edited =====
--- 1.29/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c Tue Jul 15 10:08:48 2003
+++ edited/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c Wed Aug 6 10:46:00 2003
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@
cpu_relax();
barrier();
}
+ atomic_dec(&data->count);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -256,8 +257,18 @@
cpu_relax();
barrier();
}
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ atomic_set(&data.count, num_booting_cpus() - 1);
atomic_set(&data.gate,0);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait here for everyone to have seen the gate change
+ * So we're the last ones to touch 'data'
+ */
+ while(atomic_read(&data.count)) {
+ cpu_relax();
+ barrier();
+ }
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/**
--
Mark Haverkamp <markh@osdl.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-06 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-06 8:52 Mathias Fröhlich
2003-08-06 17:15 ` john stultz
2003-08-06 18:05 ` Mark Haverkamp [this message]
2003-08-06 18:02 ` john stultz
2003-08-07 14:38 ` [PATCH] linux-2.6.0-test2_mtrr-race-fix_A0 Mark Haverkamp
2003-08-06 18:31 ` [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.6.0-test2_mtrr-race-fix_A0 Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-06 20:24 ` john stultz
2003-08-07 5:06 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-06 2:17 john stultz
2003-08-06 17:02 ` Mark Haverkamp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060193108.12048.4.camel@markh1.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=markh@osdl.org \
--cc=Mathias.Froehlich@web.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®