From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Frank Cusack <fcusack@fcusack.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, phil-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: NPTL v userland v LT (RH9+custom kernel problem)
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:49:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060246177.5142.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030807013930.A26426@google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 571 bytes --]
> So, finally getting to my question, should I even *expect* a non-NPTL
> kernel to work with the RH9 userland?
Yes, absolutely. It's a design goal of RHL to work with unpatched
kernel.org kernels.
>
> If not, is there a simple fix
> without going to NPTL, say just rebuilding glibc? hmm... now that I
> ask it I feel dumb, I do think I would need to rebuild glibc so it
> knows the kernel has LinuxThreads, not NPTL.
no need. RHL9 ships with BOTH LinuxThreads and NPTL and will switch
dynamically at runtime depending on your kernel capabilities.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-07 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-07 8:39 Frank Cusack
2003-08-07 8:49 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2003-08-07 14:42 ` Jerry Cooperstein
2003-08-07 13:06 ` Mathias Fröhlich
2003-08-08 5:45 ` Frank Cusack
2003-08-08 6:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-08 6:53 ` Peter Svensson
2003-08-08 7:10 ` Pau Aliagas
2003-08-08 10:32 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-08-08 17:37 ` Frank Cusack
2003-08-08 19:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-08-07 13:20 Luke Howard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060246177.5142.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=fcusack@fcusack.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phil-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®