From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S289481AbSBEMOZ>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:14:25 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S289380AbSBEMOP>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:14:15 -0500
Received: from [209.185.149.10] ([209.185.149.10]:1229 "EHLO
	c0mailgw05.prontomail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S289467AbSBEMOI>; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 07:14:08 -0500
X-Version: beer 7.5.2333.0
From: "william fitzgerald" <william.fitzgerald2@beer.com>
Message-Id: <1061D7F0799E88748A4C9E24BA2CD3E1@william.fitzgerald2.beer.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:18:01 +2400
X-Priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
To: weber@informatik.fh-trier.de
Subject: Re: Re: windows is more secure than linux!!
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

thanks for that information.i never knew that.

its no wonder they don't mention exactly the full
measurement of all linux verus all windows
security holes rather than as you say sometimes
leaving out sub-components convienently!!



Beer Mail, brought to you by your friends at beer.com.