From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org (mout-p-103.mailbox.org [80.241.56.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9607F392836; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 15:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792251182; cv=none; b=fY1ii6NzmPLMT8eueUSjvcH2F2oYUKy1vZWjNf7D8apioZoLiaCyHmhrcQkCnvqw02lJpv9lgNzh8kS2sbfC2aT8kINnzSFUlt9nSs+hfId5odwyvDycAayNJ6LozbmKopDUATG7dpELD5Nh8FoY2+mVCuF8hMcl0aIvBtCGRfw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792251182; c=relaxed/simple; bh=awm/5T3OP8nOySmaCCffHZ2HNGXR56c+zXIdHAAIc7o=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=RieBkW3BBd2RmtACdzyQ8+x82160+2Rex3hek99lTNr9KrEPZ8+rPRbaLay/2ci1raxzt8293zuwHEvJbi6bmt29e/Csr7qxmATCPNk5dvmOR0ss3O1GQ3aUVtkuEXyFxf3ZL9JIc8OYKdsQezB6XadKTgM8KbQ3GD6tbaVSBwg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=i+vP8gz/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="i+vP8gz/" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519MLKEM768 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4j6Qmg4SVdzKmwd; Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:32:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1792251171; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=awm/5T3OP8nOySmaCCffHZ2HNGXR56c+zXIdHAAIc7o=; b=i+vP8gz/PgzUMFCTE97ScuteN1psg6DccE5r+va7MmD0Nlx01PCH3SHzKQlFjfs9hMkE5k EABtAgU22fv3uacWuuyTANWTDzGF2QrNnOiysHqAzlx+njp4+LNwPWs/xyS/Mf0ntZHDQp IzXaaw4Tg3QOmfAqOD8ZayjGzzuabgBnnNW5JEXdh8GdlmcTAW3QqSVgcLQsY3dmMUK4GP Jv6vFHx2gSJyginlU7cC8azrv5TNZeQn6h9b6jymJH0FVbpCEDOPhLP8w2OFWPVgaN2nj0 t/8uW6LCaoXbW1n9qyyHLZa1LQZc4nWbTWkiahoFpt84hU5HSS2pQ2Njto+Z1g== Message-ID: <1061edcf257c9e625efe5f6f000013e9b2d4c650.camel@mailbox.org> Subject: [Duplicate Text] in mm/damon/ and Doc/admin-guide/mm/damon/ From: Manuel Ebner To: SJ Park , damon@lists.linux.dev Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aveline Noir , "Adrian Huang (Lenovo)" Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 17:32:47 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-1.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-ID: f1c05a7b6cbdf6f28a8 X-MBO-RS-META: 5enp6ifq9dbwkjns356ocpn3tbqsbwnj Hi SJ, there is a lot of duplicated text in these directories. Diff doesn't show any because in mm/damon/ the text is a multi-line comment. ~40 Lines in lru_sort.c and lru_sort.rst, ~50 Lines in reclaim.c and reclaim.rst and a few Lines in stat.c and stat.rst. I think it's important to decide on how to handle the duplication before patching. Delete one set, keep (and fix) both or add a reference in one place to the other? Could sphinx do the duplication? Thanks Manuel=20