From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264524AbTH2Ks0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:48:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264526AbTH2Ks0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:48:26 -0400 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:28934 "EHLO small.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264524AbTH2KsZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:48:25 -0400 Subject: Re: State of the CFQ scheduler From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: LKML In-Reply-To: <20030829065932.GL16684@suse.de> References: <1062078948.17363.4.camel@pilot.stavtrup-st.dk> <20030828194743.GH16684@suse.de> <1062107920.665.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> <20030829065932.GL16684@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1062154102.700.6.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:48:22 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 08:59, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > It shouldn't be too hard to adapt the latest version from before -mm > > > dropped it and adapting to the current kernels. If you want to give that > > > a go, I'd be happy to help you out. > > > > Why don't you post a patch against 2.6.0-test4 or 2.6.0-test4-mm1 on > > LKML? I would like to start using CFQ again :-) > > Heh, did you not read the email? :) I just wanted you to know I really like CFQ :-) > I'll see if I get squeeze it in today, stay tuned. Yes, I will ;-)