From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261252AbTILITW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:19:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261274AbTILITW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:19:22 -0400 Received: from pub237.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.237]:748 "EHLO executor.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261252AbTILITV (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:19:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [Bluez-devel] Re: [BUG] BlueTooth socket busted in 2.6.0-test5 From: David Woodhouse To: jt@hpl.hp.com Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Max Krasnyansky , BlueZ mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1063344094.7869.396.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> References: <20030910225810.GA7712@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <1063237174.28890.6.camel@pegasus> <20030911203249.GA15575@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <1063344094.7869.396.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1063354754.23778.380.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5 (dwmw2) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:19:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 06:21 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > Er, if we're actually _running_ code from the bnep module, how can it > have a zero refcount? This bug is elsewhere, surely? Please confirm this fixes it... ===== net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c 1.11 vs edited ===== --- 1.11/net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c Thu Jun 5 01:57:08 2003 +++ edited/net/bluetooth/bnep/sock.c Fri Sep 12 09:16:17 2003 @@ -186,7 +189,8 @@ static struct net_proto_family bnep_sock_family_ops = { .family = PF_BLUETOOTH, - .create = bnep_sock_create + .create = bnep_sock_create, + .owner = THIS_MODULE }; int __init bnep_sock_init(void) -- dwmw2