mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Cormack <justin@street-vision.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.7 block ramblings (was Re: DMA for ide-scsi?)
Date: 14 Sep 2003 12:15:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1063538182.1510.78.camel@lotte.street-vision.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030913212723.GA21426@gtf.org>

On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 22:27, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> IMO, we need to move users from a [probe-]order-based device and bus
> enumeration to some system based on unique ids.  I'm of the opinion
> that _both_ block devices and filesystems need some sort of GUID.
> Luckily, a lot of blkdevs/fs's are already there.
> 
> If you look at current usage out there, order isn't _terribly_ important
> given today's tools (such as LABEL=).  More important IMO is figuring
> out which spindle is your boot disk, and which is your root disk.
> Red Hat handles root disks by doing LABEL= from initrd.  But discovering
> the boot disk is still largely an unsolved problem AFAIK...

LABEL= is so broken that I immediately remove it from all my redhat
systems. It is not unique at all. As soon as you plug another system
disk into your system at boot time all hell breaks loose. At least it
could have a random number in it or something.

If you need to know your bootdisk (why?) why not just get the bootloader
to tell you?

Justin



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-14 11:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-13 20:16 James Bottomley
2003-09-13 21:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-14 11:15   ` Justin Cormack [this message]
2003-09-14 15:02     ` Alan Cox
2003-09-14 16:55       ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-14 17:01     ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 17:24       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-14 18:55       ` Alan Cox
2003-09-16  2:38         ` Thomas Molina
2003-09-16 13:56           ` Alan Cox
2003-09-14 17:20     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-14 16:12   ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 17:30     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13  2:11       ` Matt Domsch
2003-09-14 22:26         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13  6:05           ` Matt Domsch
2003-09-15 22:16           ` Matt Domsch
2003-09-15  3:23         ` Andre Hedrick
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-13 11:01 DMA for ide-scsi? Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 18:49   ` 2.7 block ramblings (was Re: DMA for ide-scsi?) Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 19:01     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 19:06       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-15  7:34       ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-16 19:49         ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-16 19:55           ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-20 18:28             ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-20 22:16               ` Alan Cox
2003-09-20 22:22                 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-20 22:46                   ` Alan Cox
2003-09-21  9:23               ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-13 19:24     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-09-13 19:57       ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1063538182.1510.78.camel@lotte.street-vision.com \
    --to=justin@street-vision.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®