From: Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot@laposte.net>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Keyboard oddness.
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:41:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064572898.21735.17.camel@ulysse.olympe.o2t> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030926102403.GA8864@ucw.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1246 bytes --]
Le ven 26/09/2003 à 12:24, Vojtech Pavlik a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:43:43AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
[...]
> > Couldn't it at least detect there's a problem ? Most people I know do not press a key
> > 2000+ times in a row during normal activity.
>
> You do. Scrolling up/down in a document is one example. And there is no
> point to limit the repeat to say 80 or 200 characters. You would still
> hate having 80 repeated characters and then it stopping.
Well then only allow monster autorepeats for arrows then.
(they are never stuck in my board anyway;)
> The problem really is there is no way to detect it. My latest patches
> should fix this for AT keyboards by not using software autorepeat for
> them.
>
> Of course this won't fix any problems with USB, if there are still any.
> My USB keyboard works just perfectly, no problems with the autorepeat.
Well mine doesn't:(. I seem to have gathered from past threads that HID
makes the full keyboard status available at all time (unlike AT which
only provides push/release events). Couldn't the repeat code just
double-check the key is really stuck every ten repeats for example ?
Cheers
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[-- Attachment #2: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-26 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-26 9:43 Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 10:24 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 10:41 ` Nicolas Mailhot [this message]
2003-09-26 10:51 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 12:48 ` jw schultz
2003-09-26 13:08 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 13:41 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 14:12 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 14:17 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 14:21 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 14:26 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 14:50 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 15:06 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 15:21 ` Nicolas Mailhot
2003-09-26 15:24 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-26 13:56 ` Helge Hafting
2003-09-26 14:01 ` Mike Dresser
2003-09-28 10:58 ` Helge Hafting
2003-10-02 12:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-01 10:09 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-01 13:06 ` Nicolas Mailhot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-20 20:33 Rob Landley
2003-09-20 22:18 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 18:51 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-21 10:04 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 20:20 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-22 20:06 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-22 22:06 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 0:23 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-23 10:51 ` Greg Louis
2003-09-25 23:59 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-26 1:27 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-26 8:15 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-26 8:43 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-26 8:46 ` Vojtech Pavlik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1064572898.21735.17.camel@ulysse.olympe.o2t \
--to=nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®