From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:09:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10646.1393243751@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140224084437.GG20680@thin>
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> > This means we actually want BUG() to end with __builtin_unreachable()
> > as in the CONFIG_BUG=y case, and also ensure it actually is
> > unreachable. As I have shown in [1], the there is a small overhead
> > of doing this in terms of code size.
>
> I agree that allowing BUG() to become a no-op seems suboptimal, if only
> because of the resulting warnings and mis-optimizations. However, I
> think the overhead could be cut down massively, such that BUG() just
> compiles down to a one-byte undefined instruction. (__builtin_trap()
> might do the right thing here; worth checking.)
Is it possible to use an inline function with an empty body in this? Let the
compiler prune away all the arguments?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-24 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-22 19:23 Josh Triplett
2014-02-22 21:54 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-02-22 22:31 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-22 22:36 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-24 8:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-24 8:44 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-24 9:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-24 12:09 ` David Howells [this message]
2014-02-24 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-24 13:16 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-02-24 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-24 23:17 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-25 3:06 ` Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10646.1393243751@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®