mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: "Lisa R. Nelson" <lisanels@cableone.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: File Permissions are incorrect. Security flaw in Linux
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:58:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1065016679.2445.5.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1065012013.4078.2.camel@lisaserver>

On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 14:40, Lisa R. Nelson wrote:

> [1.] One line summary of the problem:    
> A low level user can delete a file owned by root and belonging to group
> root even if the files permissions are 744.  This is not in agreement
> with Unix, and is a major security issue.

Don't know which Unix you are referring to, but on Solaris and Linux,
the delete (unlink) and create file operations are subject to directory
permissions. Thus, deleting a file requires write permission on the
directory. The write permission on a file allows to modify its contents
and has nothing to do with being able to delete it.

Thus, what you are seeing is completely normal:

1. mkdir /mydir
2. cd /mydir
3. chmod 777 .
4. touch myfile
5. chmod 444 myfile

Anyone will be able to delete "myfile" since the directory where it
belongs (mydir) has full write privileges for anyone.

I recommend you using the sticky bit on shared directories, like /tmp.
If a directory has the sticky bit enabled, a file can only be deleted by
its owner (and root, of course):

1. mkdir /mydir
2. cd /mydir
3. chmod 1777 .
4. touch myfile

Now, "myfile" can only be deleted by its owner (or root), since the
directory where it belongs is marked with the sticky bit.

HTH



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-01 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-01 12:40 Lisa R. Nelson
2003-10-01 13:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-01 13:08 ` Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer
2003-10-01 13:23 ` viro
     [not found]   ` <1065017722.2995.10.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2003-10-01 15:40     ` viro
2003-10-01 19:27       ` DervishD
2003-10-01 13:53 ` Jurjen Oskam
2003-10-01 14:09   ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-10-01 14:22     ` Andreas Schwab
2003-10-01 15:01   ` John Bradford
2003-10-01 13:58 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2003-10-01 14:21 ` DervishD
     [not found] ` <1065044031.2158.23.camel@wynken.reefedge.com>
2003-10-01 14:37   ` Lisa R. Nelson
2003-10-01 15:11     ` Bas Mevissen
2003-10-01 15:12     ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-10-01 16:08     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-10-01 19:21       ` DervishD
2003-10-01 20:30         ` viro
2003-10-01 17:23     ` Brett
2003-10-01 19:24       ` DervishD
2003-10-02 10:32 ` Christian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1065016679.2445.5.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com \
    --to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lisanels@cableone.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®