From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262594AbTJIV1q (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:27:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262598AbTJIV1q (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:27:46 -0400 Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov ([192.16.0.25]:5807 "EHLO mailwasher-b.lanl.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262594AbTJIV1P (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:27:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [Fastboot] kexec update (2.6.0-test7) From: Steven Cole To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Cherry George Mathew , "Randy.Dunlap" , fastboot@osdl.org, lkml , Hans Reiser In-Reply-To: References: <20031008172235.70d6b794.rddunlap@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1065734288.1658.35.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4-1.1mdk Date: 09 Oct 2003 15:18:08 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 12:40, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Cherry George Mathew writes: > > > On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > > You'll need to update the kexec-syscall.c file for the correct > > > kexec syscall number (274). > > > > Is there a consensus about what the syscall number will finally be ? We've > > jumped from 256 to 274 over the 2.5.x+ series kernels. Or is it the law > > the Jungle ? > > So far the law of the jungle. Regardless of the rest it looks like it > is time to submit a place keeping patch. > > Eric > - And if Linus takes that patch, Hans should do the same for __NR_reiser4 for the same reason. Steven