From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263485AbTJVRAz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:00:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263486AbTJVRAz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:00:55 -0400 Received: from nat9.steeleye.com ([65.114.3.137]:24324 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263485AbTJVRAz (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:00:55 -0400 Subject: Re: Fix x86 subarch breakage by the patch to allow more APIC irq sources From: James Bottomley To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , jamesclv@us.ibm.com, Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9) Date: 22 Oct 2003 11:59:31 -0500 Message-Id: <1066841973.12312.81.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 11:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I'd much rather do this the other way: I _detest_ "generic" values that > architectures can override, when just defining the value in the > architecture directly is smaller than the test for the generic value. That's fine by me...I was originally going to do it that way until I saw that two other subarchs had the same problem. James