From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264254AbTLAWUg (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:20:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264245AbTLAWUg (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:20:36 -0500 Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.29]:53743 "EHLO mwinf0204.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264254AbTLAWUc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:20:32 -0500 Subject: Re: Partitions on a loopback block device? From: christophe varoqui To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: devoteam Message-Id: <1070317227.15260.44.camel@zezette> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5-1mdk Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 23:20:27 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > A simple approach would be to use losetup with the offset function for > every single parttion (while I'm not sure whether this works through > the CHS geometry). > Or simply map the partitions with the device mapper. Tools like partx/dmpartx may help. regards, cvaroqui