From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262775AbTLBSKm (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:10:42 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262731AbTLBSIl
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:08:41 -0500
Received: from host-65-120-145-91.coremetrics.com ([65.120.145.91]:55145 "EHLO
	localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262725AbTLBSIA (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Dec 2003 13:08:00 -0500
Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4
From: Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>, Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, XFS List <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@logos.cnet>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312020919410.13692-100000@logos.cnet>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Coremetrics, Inc.
Message-Id: <1070388326.2380.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 12:05:26 -0600
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 05:22, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> [...]
> My whole point is "2.6 is almost out of the door and its so much
> better".  
> Its much faster, much cleaner. 

I agree with this, even in spite of my earlier arguments. I do like 2.6,
but I think there are some valid points listed recently for 2.4
inclusion. I might just be an end-user, but I do appreciate XFS for what
it is, and have been using it for a while now. It just seems like
natural inclusion at this point almost "just makes sense."


-- 
Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>
Coremetrics, Inc.